{"id":6665,"date":"2015-09-29T16:25:10","date_gmt":"2015-09-29T16:25:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/?p=6665"},"modified":"2020-06-20T22:38:49","modified_gmt":"2020-06-20T22:38:49","slug":"typology-lessons-from-von-franz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/2015\/09\/typology-lessons-from-von-franz\/","title":{"rendered":"Typology Lessons from von Franz"},"content":{"rendered":"

Marie-Louise von Franz (1915 \u2013 1998) was a Jungian psychologist and close associate of Jung. In her book,\u00a0C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time<\/em>,\u00a0von Franz lays out some general principles of Jungian typology as she sees them, which we reiterate below. All quotations are from the\u00a0<\/em>Inner City Books 1998 edition of the book.<\/p>\n

\"von<\/a>1: As Jolande Jacobi also reported Jung to have said, Intuition is not synonymous with Imagination, Fantasy, or Creativity:<\/strong><\/p>\n

“Intuition is not identical with fantasy which Jung regards as a human capacity independent of the functions.”\u00a0– Von Franz: \u00a0C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time\u00a0<\/em>p. 47<\/p>\n

“Fantasy can find expression via thinking, feeling, intuition and [sensation]\u00a0and is therefore probably an ability sui generis<\/em>, with deep roots in the unconscious.”\u00a0– Von Franz: \u00a0C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time\u00a0<\/em>p. 47n30<\/p>\n

“[Jung] rejects the usual notion that artistic inspiration is limited to the intuitive type. \u2026 Fantasy is indeed the source of all creative inspiration, but it is a gift that can come to any of the four [function] types.\u201d \u2013 Jolande Jacobi: The Psychology of C.G. Jung<\/em>\u00a0(Yale University Press 1973) p. 24<\/p>\n

2: Jung’s Typology Is a System of Four Functions (Each with Two Orientations), Not of\u00a0Eight Functions:<\/strong><\/p>\n

“… when Jung …\u00a0studied the way in which individuals adapt to their environment …\u00a0he discovered that one could divide these attempts at adaptation into four basic forms of psychic activity or psychological functions. … [These]\u00a0four functions provide a sort of basic orientation for the ego in the chaos of appearances.”\u00a0–\u00a0Von Franz: \u00a0C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time\u00a0<\/em>pp.\u00a046-47<\/p>\n

3: The Fourth (Inferior) Function Is “Nearly Always” Unconscious<\/a>:<\/strong><\/p>\n

“[The fourth function] nearly always remains largely unconscious, for which reason Jung calls it the ‘inferior function.’ Here the light of ego-consciousness turns into twilight. Our attempts to adapt with the fourth function are to a large extent uncontrolled and often fall under the influence of\u00a0…\u00a0the unconscious personality. … The fourth function …\u00a0will be primitive, spontaneously arbitrary, intense, undisciplined and archaic. Moreover, it behaves somewhat in the fashion of the opposite attitude type, which means that, for example, the feeling of an introverted thinking type is extraverted, bound to the object, and the sensation of an extraverted intuitive will be introverted, etc.” –\u00a0Von Franz: \u00a0C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time\u00a0<\/em>p.\u00a048&n34<\/p>\n

4: According to von Franz,\u00a0Freud Had Inferior Te<\/a>:<\/strong><\/p>\n

“Freud’s thinking corresponded to an extraverted approach to scientific research. … The evaluation of Freud’s thinking as extraverted does not mean that\u00a0Freud, as a man, was himself extraverted. In my opinion he was an introverted feeling type and his thinking was\u00a0accordingly extraverted.” – Von Franz: \u00a0C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time\u00a0<\/em>p.\u00a061&n36<\/p>\n

5: Jung’s Typology Cannot Be Understood without Reference to\u00a0Heraclitean Logic<\/a>:<\/strong><\/p>\n

“[In Jung’s typology] the differentiation between subject and object, between inner and outer, gradually takes place. This contribution of Jung’s to the psychology of consciousness\u00a0…\u00a0received almost no recognition in the wider field of philosophic-academic psychology, because it is concerned with a description of ego-consciousness which cannot be understood without experience of its mirror-world, the unconscious.<\/em>”\u00a0– Von Franz: \u00a0C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time\u00a0<\/em>p. 46n28<\/p>\n

6: Bonus Lesson: On Parmenides’ Cosmic Sphere<\/a>:<\/strong><\/p>\n

“…as early as the school of Parmenides the structural image of a sphere …\u00a0as the form of the ultimate basic principle of the cosmos, emerged. The natural philosophers probably took this image from the older pantheistic Orphism, in which the godhead was thought of as an all-embracing presence with cyclical or spherical form, encompassing beginning, middle and end. The same image appears again in Empedocles<\/a>. In his view, when the cosmos is under the dominion of Eros, it is “on all sides like to himself and everywhere without end, Sphaeros, the sphere-shaped, above the loneliness prevailing all around, filled with joyful pride.” In Anaximander’s case the world-principle is the Apeiron (the limitless), but at the center of the world there is a ‘sphere which firmly encircles the cosmos.’\u00a0For Xenophanes<\/a> the cosmic god is limited and spherical, ‘always and everywhere homogeneous,’ ‘shaking the universe … by the thought-power of his spirit.'”\u00a0– Von Franz: \u00a0C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time\u00a0<\/em>p. 142, cf.\u00a0Dietrich Mahnke: Unendliche Sph\u00e4re und Allmittelpunkt<\/em> (G\u00fcnther Holzboog 1966)\u00a0pp. 243-244<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

Image of von Franz\u00a0in the article commissioned for this publication from artist\u00a0Georgios Magkakis.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Marie-Louise von Franz (1915 \u2013 1998) was a Jungian psychologist and close associate of Jung. In her book,\u00a0C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time,\u00a0von Franz lays out some general principles of Jungian typology as she sees them, which we reiterate below. All quotations are from the\u00a0Inner City Books 1998 edition of the book. 1: As[\u2026] Continue Reading<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-psychology"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6665"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6665\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6700,"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6665\/revisions\/6700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idrlabs.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}