Alt-right Test

The IDRlabs Alt-right Profiling Test (IDR-ARPT©) is the property of IDRlabs International. The IDR-ARPT is primarily based on the research of Forscher, P. S., & Kteily, N. (2019, June 7). A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right.

This Alt-right Profiling Test has been made with the aid of professional analysts who have experience with political psychology. The test uses genuine psychometric items to measure the respondent’s correspondence to underlying political patterns, as well as to gauge the respondent’s general political profile in comparison with those of a typical liberal, conservative, or alt-righter. The test is based on the research of Forscher, P. S., & Kteily, N. (2019, June 7). A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right.

Alt-right Profiling Tests, whether they are professional, used in academic research, or free online tests like this one, are indicators to help give you a clue as to your typical thought patterns and your general thoughts, values, feelings, and behaviors as these relate to participation in society. In general, when dealing with political profiling tests like this one, no test ever devised can designate your political allegiance with complete accuracy or reliability, and no test can replace familiarizing yourself with the issues related to politics in depth. For more information on the Alt-right Profiling Test, consult materials from the original paper: Forscher, P. S., & Kteily, N. (2019, June 7). A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right.

The authors of this free online Alt-right Profiling Test are certified in the use of numerous different personality tests and have worked professionally with psychology, political psychology, and personality testing. Prior to using our free online alt-right test, please note that the results are provided "as-is", for free, and should not be construed as providing professional or certified advice of any kind. For more on our online alt-right test, please consult our Terms of Service.

References

• Duggan, M. (2014). Online Harassment. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/
• Forscher, P. S., Cox, W. T. L., Graetz, N., & Devine, P. G. (2015). The motivation to express prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000030
• Forscher, P. S., & Kteily, N. (2019, June 7). A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right. Retrieved from osf.io/xge8q. Preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/c9uvw
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109– 118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
• Hetherington, M., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 249–269). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Kteily, N. S., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 901–931. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000048
• McIntosh, Peggy (2018). White privilege and male privilege. In Kimmel, Michael S. (ed.): Privilege A Reader. Routledge. doi.org/10.4324/9780429494802
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
• Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The Interface Between Ethnic and National Attachment: Ethnic Pluralism or Ethnic Dominance? The Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102–133.