Skip to main content

Partner Zone Test

The Partner Zone is a popular phenomenon in online culture. Some find the theory enlightening and elucidating, while others maintain that it’s simplistic and overly reductive. The theory attempts to determine what value or zone a person would be relegated to in the heterosexual dating hierarchy.

To take the test, indicate your responses to each of the following statements below.

Question 1

Select the type of test you want to take:


The IDRlabs Partner Zoning Test was developed by IDRlabs on the basis of a chart made by the content creator, hoe_math. IDRlabs is not affiliated with the chart’s original author.

The term "hoe_math dating zones" refers to a concept that has gained traction on social media, particularly TikTok. It describes a system for categorizing romantic relationships based on perceived attractiveness and availability.

Here's a breakdown of the concept:

  • The Zones: There's a chart with zones representing different types of relationships. These zones are determined by a person's attractiveness (physical and personality) and how "available" they are perceived to be (seeing other people, wanting commitment, etc.).
  • Criticisms: The concept is criticized for being overly simplistic and potentially disrespectful. It reduces people to attractiveness scores and suggests a game-like approach to dating.
  • Possible Benefits: Some supporters argue it can help people identify situations they might not want (like the "chronically unhappy" zone) and encourage clear communication about expectations.

Here are some things to consider:

  • Focus on Communication: Open communication about what you want in a relationship is much healthier than a classification system.
  • Respectful Relationships: A good relationship is built on mutual respect, not keeping score based on attractiveness.
  • Individuality: Everyone has different values and priorities in dating. There's no one-size-fits-all approach.

While the specific zones and their names can vary depending on the source, here's a general breakdown of how some versions of "hoe_math dating zones" categorize relationships:

Zones based on Attractiveness and Availability:

  • Wife/Husband Material: High attractiveness, low availability (looking for commitment).
  • Booty Call/Situationship: High attractiveness, high availability (not looking for commitment).
  • Catch/Prospect: Developing attraction, potential for more depending on how things progress.
  • Mistake Zone: Initial attraction overshadowed by negative qualities or unmet expectations.
  • Chronically Unhappy: Settled for someone who doesn't meet their needs.

Issues with the Zones:

  • Oversimplification: It ignores factors like emotional compatibility, shared values, and communication.
  • Focus on Looks: Attractiveness is subjective and can change over time. It shouldn't be the sole factor.
  • Gender Bias: The system often focuses on how people are perceived on the basis of their gender, neglecting those who do not conform to gender stereotypes.

Alternatives to Hoe_Math:

  • Honest Communication: Talking openly about your expectations and desires in a relationship is key.
  • Healthy Boundaries: Knowing your worth and setting boundaries to avoid unhealthy situations.
  • Shared Values: Finding someone who aligns with your values and goals for a fulfilling relationship.

Remember, this concept is for entertainment purposes and shouldn't be a rigid guideline for dating. Focus on building genuine connections and open communication for a healthier dating experience.

Despite the popularity of hoe_math, it's important to remember that it can be emotionally limiting. By focusing on zones, you might miss connections that don't fit neatly into categories. Additionally, it can create a sense of competition or manipulation in dating, which isn't conducive to finding a lasting, happy relationship. Ultimately, dating is about finding someone you click with and enjoy being around. While reflecting on your wants is valuable, prioritize open communication and shared experiences over a point system.

This test cannot be used to provide clinical assessments or an accurate evaluation of your personality. Clinical assessments should always be done in cooperation with a mental health professional. For more information about any of our online tests and quizzes, please consult our Terms of Service.

Why Use This Test?

1. Free. The test is provided to you free of charge.

2. Statistical controls. Test scores are logged into an anonymized database. Statistical analysis of the test is conducted to ensure maximum accuracy and validity of the test scores.

3. Made by professionals. The present test has been made with the input of people who work professionally in psychology and individual differences research.