Skip to main content

Woke Attitudes Test

The Woke Attitudes Test measures contemporary beliefs about social justice, identity, and equity, drawing on validated instruments in the literature. Building on scales such as Lahtinen’s Critical Social Justice Attitude Scale (CSJAS), the Social Justice Scale (SJS), and the Basic Social Justice Orientations (BSJO), this test captures attitudes toward systemic inequality, inclusion, and cultural norms. By assessing agreement with statements on topics like race, gender, and institutional reform, the test provides insight into the values and priorities that shape modern progressive ideology.

Are you woke? For each of the following statements, indicate your agreement below.

Question 1 of 25

Colorblind approaches to race do more harm than good by ignoring structural inequality.

Disagree
Agree

NEXT

Woke ideology is a term used to describe a set of social and political attitudes that emphasize awareness of systemic inequality, discrimination, and social justice. Originally derived from African American Vernacular English (AAVE), the term “woke” initially referred to being aware of social injustices, particularly those affecting marginalized communities. Over time, the concept has expanded to encompass a broader commitment to identifying and addressing inequalities related to race, gender, sexuality, disability, and other social categories.

At its core, woke ideology emphasizes the recognition of structural power imbalances. Proponents argue that inequality is not solely the result of individual behavior, but is embedded in institutions, policies, and cultural norms. This perspective often involves examining historical and contemporary systems, including education, the legal system, employment, and media, to identify patterns of exclusion or disadvantage. Woke ideology encourages both awareness and action, suggesting that recognizing inequality should be coupled with efforts to challenge or correct it.

Language and terminology play a significant role in woke thought. Terms such as “microaggressions,” “privilege,” “intersectionality,” and “inclusive language” are frequently used to describe subtle forms of discrimination, overlapping social identities, and the ways in which words can shape social perception. Advocates argue that precise and inclusive language can reduce harm, foster belonging, and make discussions of inequality more accessible. Critically, these linguistic frameworks also aim to make individuals aware of how societal structures can influence behavior and perceptions, even unintentionally.

Woke ideology is closely associated with activism and institutional reform. Supporters often advocate for changes in policy, representation, and organizational practices to create more equitable outcomes. Examples include initiatives to diversify workplaces and educational curricula, efforts to make media representation more inclusive, and campaigns to reform policing or legal practices perceived as unjust. Social and cultural critique is also central to the ideology, with attention given to historical injustices, symbols, and narratives that may perpetuate inequality.

Criticism of woke ideology has emerged from a range of perspectives. Some critics argue that its emphasis on social identity and language policing can restrict free speech, create divisiveness, or foster moral judgment based on perceived adherence to social norms. Others contend that its focus on systemic factors may downplay individual responsibility or merit-based outcomes. Proponents, however, argue that the ideology is primarily concerned with addressing persistent inequities and fostering a more inclusive society.

Woke ideology has gained prominence in academic, corporate, and public discourse over the past two decades. It intersects with other progressive frameworks, including critical race theory, feminist theory, and disability studies. Its influence is visible in media discussions, workplace diversity and inclusion programs, and educational initiatives. While the term “woke” is sometimes used pejoratively in popular culture, its underlying principles focus on recognizing inequality, promoting equity, and encouraging socially responsible behavior.

In summary, woke ideology is a framework for understanding and addressing social inequality. It emphasizes systemic analysis, inclusive language, and proactive engagement with marginalized communities. While it is often associated with progressive political movements, the ideology itself encompasses a range of beliefs and practices aimed at fostering awareness, equity, and social change. Its influence on contemporary culture and policy continues to evolve, reflecting ongoing debates about justice, identity, and societal responsibility.

References

  • Lahtinen, O. (2024). Construction and validation of a scale for assessing critical social justice attitudes. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 65(4), 693–705. DOI:10.1111/sjop.13018 — A validated instrument (CSJAS) for measuring endorsement of critical social justice beliefs (“woke” attitudes).
  • Hülle, S., Liebig, S., & May, M. (2018). Measuring attitudes toward distributive justice: The Basic Social Justice Orientations Scale. Social Indicators Research, 136(2), 663–692 — A scale assessing support for distributive justice principles: equality, need, equity, and entitlement (BSJO).
  • Torres-Harding, S., Siers, B., & Olson, B. D. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Social Justice Scale (SJS). American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(2), 77–88 — Measures social justice–related attitudes, norms, and perceived control.

Woke Attitudes Test

Why Use This Test?

1. Free and accessible. The Woke Attitudes Test is available at no cost, allowing you to explore your beliefs and attitudes related to social justice, inclusion, equity, cultural awareness, and systemic thinking. It provides a structured way to reflect on values that influence contemporary social and political debates.

2. Scientifically informed. Test responses are anonymized and incorporated into a database for research purposes. Analyses are conducted to ensure that scores are reliable, consistent, and meaningful, allowing for accurate measurement of attitudes across diverse populations.

3. Developed by experts. This test was created with input from researchers and professionals in psychology, social sciences, and attitude measurement. Its design is grounded in validated instruments such as the Critical Social Justice Attitude Scale (CSJAS), the Social Justice Scale (SJS), and the Basic Social Justice Orientations Scale (BSJO).