Skip to main content

The Good Fight Test

Which Good Fight character do you most resemble?

The Good Fight plunges you into a chaotic world of high-stakes Chicago law, political schemes, and constant moral compromises. Some lawyers fight with Diane Lockhart's icy elegance and deep principles, while others rely on Lucca Quinn's sharp ambition and cool pragmatism to survive the madness.

Take this test to discover which Good Fight character matches your way of handling pressure, ethics, and crisis.

Question 1 of 35

I act as a moral conscience on systemic issues in my group.

Disagree
Agree

BACK NEXT

The Good Fight Test is inspired by psychometric methodology and based on research into the characters of the series. The test provides feedback such as the following:

Diane Lockhart

Diane Lockhart is a sophisticated, high-powered attorney who strives to uphold justice and constitutional order in a chaotic world. She maintains an elegant, icily composed exterior even when her personal and professional life implodes. Her core drive is to fight systemic corruption with sharp intellect and principled strategy. However, she constantly wrestles with the realization that the legal system is deeply flawed. To cope with political dread, she sometimes turns to unconventional, borderline reckless methods behind closed doors. She is a dedicated mentor to younger colleagues and fiercely protective of her allies. Though she values stability, she repeatedly chooses to stand up and fight rather than retreat.

Maia Rindell

Maia Rindell is a young lawyer whose promising career is instantly derailed by her family's massive financial scandal. She enters the professional world under a heavy cloud of public scrutiny and suspicion. Though she begins her career as an idealistic and rule-bound associate, the harsh legal environment forces her to adapt. To survive professional threats, she abandons her quiet approach and adopts theatrical, ruthless tactics. She struggles to trust others and isolates herself to prevent betrayal, even pushing away close friends. Her desire to prove she is strong leads her to bend the rules. She constantly balances her desire to be good with a fierce instinct to survive.

Lucca Quinn

Lucca Quinn is a whip-smart, cool-headed attorney who excels at navigating high-stakes legal battles with sharp logic and dry wit. As a rising star in her firm, she strives for professional autonomy and unmatched competence. Yet, she constantly wrestles with the guilt of balancing her demanding career with her responsibilities as a parent. She uses sarcasm and a detached demeanor to keep others at a distance, hiding her fear of vulnerability behind a polished, professional shield. Pragmatic and fiercely independent, she prefers to outsmart her rivals quietly. She values genuine connections but guards her inner life closely, trusting her own capabilities above all else.

Adrian Boseman

Adrian Boseman is the charismatic managing partner of a prestigious law firm who fights tirelessly for his community. He commands every room he enters with sophisticated style and powerful rhetoric. His core motive is to protect his organization's legacy and champion civil rights. However, he constantly struggles to balance these noble ideals against the harsh, practical realities of running a business. He often hides his personal vulnerabilities behind a confident, swaggering leadership style. While he relishes courtroom combat and public debates, he is pragmatic enough to make compromises when survival demands it. He is a strong, natural leader who carries the weight of institutional responsibility.

Marissa Gold

Marissa Gold is a sharp investigator and aspiring lawyer who uses her disarming, chatty charm to navigate a high-stakes legal world. She bypasses formal protocols to uncover crucial information, making her easily underestimated by traditional authority figures. Her core motive is to find excitement and make a real impact, yet she struggles with a quiet fear of being dismissed as inexperienced. Instead of following strict procedures, she relies on her wit and improvisational skills to solve complex problems. She speaks truth to power and fiercely defends her colleagues, but she guards a vulnerable need for genuine loyalty after facing painful betrayals.

Jay DiPersia

Jay DiPersia is the firm's quiet lead investigator who serves as its steady moral compass. He prefers to listen and observe rather than talk, using his silence to gather information and disarm others. While he works behind the scenes, he does not hesitate to challenge powerful partners when their decisions compromise core ethical values. He balances a deep loyalty to his colleagues with a fierce independence, often bending rules to uncover the truth. Underneath his calm and grounded exterior lies a rich, complex inner life that helps him process systemic injustice and personal hardship. He stands up for what is right without needing the spotlight.

Liz Reddick

Liz Reddick is a principled civil-rights advocate and law firm leader who serves as her organization's moral conscience. Her core motive is to secure genuine justice for her community and protect her firm's integrity. However, she constantly wrestles with the contradiction of fighting systemic bias while working inside a compromised legal system. She directly challenges performative allyship and superficial support for social causes. While she guards her emotions closely, she forms deep, protective alliances with trusted peers. She carries the heavy weight of her family legacy. Liz balances her fierce ideals with the pragmatic demands of institutional survival, always striving to hold her world accountable.

The Good Fight Test

Why Use This Test?

1. Free. The Good Fight Test is provided free of charge and lets you compare your answers with characters in the series.

2. Everyday self-report. The questions translate the cast's sharp strategies, moral compromises, and systemic battles into everyday scenarios about how you handle workplace politics and personal ethics.

3. For entertainment and reflection. The result is meant for fan comparison and self-reflection, not diagnosis or formal assessment.