Based on the research of Daniel M. Wegner at the University of Virginia.
Thought Suppression Test (WBSI)
Do you try to push unwanted thoughts out of your mind?
In 1994, psychologists Daniel M. Wegner and Sophia Zanakos at the University of Virginia developed an instrument to assess how individuals handle unwanted or intrusive mental content.
When distressing thoughts arise, do you let them pass, or do you actively push them away? This test measures your tendency toward thought suppression. How much energy do you spend trying not to think about certain topics? To take the test, enter your input below.
Question 1 of 15
I have thoughts that I cannot stop.
| Disagree | Agree |
BACK NEXT
The psychological study of thought suppression gained widespread prominence through the pioneering experimental work of social psychologist Daniel M. Wegner. Drawing inspiration from an observation by writer Fyodor Dostoevsky—who famously noted the difficulty of trying not to think of a white bear—Wegner designed empirical studies to examine what happens when individuals attempt to silence specific thoughts. His findings revealed that deliberate avoidance often leads to the very mental content returning with greater persistence. To capture this dynamic outside the laboratory, Wegner and Sophia Zanakos developed the White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI) in 1994, creating a standardized self-report instrument to assess individual differences in the chronic tendency to suppress unwanted thoughts, unpleasant emotions, and intrusive mental imagery.
In daily life, thought suppression manifests as a deliberate attempt to push uncomfortable, embarrassing, or distressing ideas out of conscious awareness. People frequently employ suppression to avoid reliving painful memories, worrying about future responsibilities, managing awkward interpersonal interactions, or coping with persistent self-critical evaluations. While actively putting an unpleasant thought out of mind can feel like a natural and intuitive strategy for maintaining emotional equilibrium, it demands continuous cognitive energy. When individuals consistently rely on mental avoidance rather than acknowledging or working through their internal experiences, the avoided thoughts tend to linger unresolved beneath everyday consciousness, subtly shaping mood and focus.
Extensive psychological research has demonstrated that thought suppression often produces what researchers call an ironic rebound effect. According to Wegner's ironic process theory of mental control, trying not to think about something requires two simultaneous mental operations: a conscious operating process that actively searches for distracting thoughts, and an automatic monitoring process that continuously checks for occurrences of the unwanted thought. When a person faces stress, mental fatigue, or emotional strain, the conscious operating process falters, while the automatic monitoring process continues to scan for the forbidden idea. As a result, the suppressed thought paradoxically resurfaces in conscious awareness with heightened frequency and emotional intensity.
Numerous empirical investigations utilizing the WBSI have linked high levels of thought suppression to broader patterns of psychological distress. Chronic attempts to suppress mental content are strongly correlated with intrusive thinking, rumination, elevated anxiety, low mood, and sleep disruptions. Rather than producing peace of mind, the persistent effort to control and eliminate unwanted thoughts can generate a frustrating cycle of mental vigilance and perceived failure. Understanding one's own tendency toward thought suppression can therefore offer valuable insight into how personal coping habits and cognitive strategies influence day-to-day emotional well-being.
The population comparison markers presented on your chart are estimates, not validated percentiles. They are reference points derived from published academic samples rather than universally validated clinical percentiles or standardized diagnostic norms. Because cognitive styles and self-reported suppression tendencies vary across different demographic groups, cultural backgrounds, and life circumstances, these markers are included solely to offer general comparative context for your self-reflection rather than an exact statistical ranking against the general population.
This test is provided strictly for educational, informational, and self-exploratory purposes. It does not constitute a psychological evaluation, psychiatric diagnosis, or mental health assessment, and it should not be used as a substitute for professional clinical guidance or therapeutic care. This online assessment is based on the White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI) and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by its original developers or their associated academic institutions.
References
- Wegner, D. M. & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic Thought Suppression. Journal of Personality, 62(4), 615-640.
