Based on the research of Han Goossens.
Emotional Dependency Test (IDI)
How dependent are you on others for emotional support and decisions?
Developed from research by Hirschfeld and colleagues (1977) and further studied by Han Goossens, the Interpersonal Dependency Inventory measures how you balance reliance on others with personal autonomy.
By evaluating your responses across key interpersonal dimensions, this test provides insight into your emotional reliance, low self-confidence, and independence in everyday relationships.
How much do your emotional well-being and daily choices depend on the approval of people around you? To take the test, enter your input below.
Question 1 of 48
It is hard for me to ask someone for a favour.
| Disagree | Agree |
BACK NEXT
The Interpersonal Dependency Inventory (IDI) was originally created in 1977 by R. M. A. Hirschfeld, G. L. Kierman, H. G. Gough, J. Barrett, S. J. Korchin, and P. Chodoff to provide a systematic method for evaluating complex interpersonal behaviors and psychological needs. Interpersonal dependency reflects a broad trait involving a person's need for emotional support, guidance, approval, and closeness from other individuals. While every human being relies on social bonds and connection to some degree, the degree and nature of this reliance vary significantly across individuals. Subsequent studies, including research conducted by Han Goossens, expanded our understanding of how these relational tendencies structure personal autonomy and social attachment. The IDI was designed to capture both adaptive relational traits and patterns that might lead to interpersonal distress when unbalanced.
In daily life, the IDI evaluates three core dimensions that together construct an individual's emotional dependency profile. The first facet, Emotional Reliance, measures the extent to which a person seeks reassurance, validation, and emotional backing from others. Individuals with high emotional reliance often place a premium on pleasing significant others, seeking frequent feedback before feeling secure in their decisions. The second facet, Low Self-Confidence, reflects an individual's belief in their ability to handle personal challenges and assert themselves in social settings. High self-confidence manifests as a comfort with taking initiative, making decisions independently, and leading rather than defaulting to the position of a follower during interpersonal interactions.
The third dimension, Assertion of Autonomy, examines a person's preference for self-sufficiency and independence from external influence. People scoring high on autonomy prefer to resolve personal problems on their own, often feeling uncomfortable when fussed over or overly cared for during difficult times. This trait reflects a protective boundaries approach, prioritizing self-direction over reliance on social networks. Achieving healthy interpersonal functioning does not mean maximizing total independence at the expense of intimacy, nor does it mean relying entirely on others. Rather, psychological well-being involves a flexible balance where emotional connection and individual autonomy support each other across different life situations.
Psychological research utilizing the IDI demonstrates that understanding these underlying dimensions offers valuable insights into relationship dynamics, stress responses, and coping mechanisms. Studies indicate that high emotional reliance paired with low self-confidence can lead to anxiety during life transitions or periods of conflict, as individuals may feel ill-equipped to navigate difficulties without immediate support. Conversely, strong autonomy can foster resilience during individual pursuits, though extreme self-reliance might sometimes hinder the formation of deep emotional bonds. By measuring these facets simultaneously, the IDI provides a nuanced portrait of how people navigate closeness, authority, decision-making, and personal identity within their social environments.
When viewing your visual summary, note that the chart's population comparison markers are estimates derived from published research samples, not validated percentiles or standardized norms for any specific demographic group. These benchmark values serve as contextual references to help you visualize how your responses align with broader trends observed in research literature. They should be interpreted as general reference points rather than exact standardizations.
This online assessment is designed strictly for educational and self-reflection purposes and does not constitute a clinical diagnosis, psychological evaluation, or professional consultation. Although based on the Interpersonal Dependency Inventory, this test is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by the original authors or their institutions. If you are experiencing distress regarding your relationships or emotional well-being, consulting a qualified mental health professional can provide personalized guidance tailored to your needs.
References
- Hirschfeld, R. M., Klerman, G. L., Gouch, H. G., Barrett, J., Korchin, S. J., & Chodoff, P. (1977). A Measure of Interpersonal Dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41(6), 610-618.
