Based on the research of M. Atkinson (2012).
Emotional Maturity Test (EMQ)
Are you living a fulfilling life directed by your values?
Based on research and the Emotional Maturity Questionnaire (EMQ) introduced by Mark Atkinson in 2012, this test offers a clear, practical snapshot of your everyday habits and attitudes toward personal growth and relationships. This assessment is not affiliated with Mark Atkinson or any associated institution.
The questionnaire measures emotional maturity as a single, integrated scale rather than breaking it into separate traits. How closely do your daily choices align with what matters most to you? To take the test, enter your input below.
Question 1 of 20
Most of the time, I am able to help others freely, with no strings attached.
| Disagree | Agree |
BACK NEXT
The Emotional Maturity Questionnaire (EMQ) was originally presented by Mark Atkinson in 2012 as a way for people to reflect on their personal approach to living well. In his framework, the total score indicates a person's level of emotional maturity, which Atkinson presents as one component of true happiness alongside present-moment awareness. Rather than treating personal growth as a mysterious or clinical concept, the EMQ grounds the idea in everyday reflection, asking how intentionally you navigate your inner life, your commitments, and your connections with the people around you.
Unlike multi-dimensional inventories that divide personality into competing traits, the EMQ is structured around a single overall Emotional Maturity Scale. All twenty statements in the questionnaire contribute in the same direction toward one integrated score. In everyday life, this single continuum captures practices like actively creating a healthy, meaningful, and fulfilling life directed by your personal values—the things that are most important to you. It also reflects whether you feel committed to realizing your full potential and whether you invest yourself in engaging in rich and satisfying relationships.
In 2015, a Russian-language psychometric study of the EMQ was conducted at Sholokhov Moscow State University for the Humanities, examining how the twenty statements function together as a single scale. In a Russian-language validation sample of 360 people aged 17 to 66, the researchers reported an internal consistency Cronbach's alpha of .871 for the total Emotional Maturity Scale, along with a test-retest Spearman correlation of .67 over a period of about one and a half months. Because those reliability estimates come from a Russian-language version and the study reports no English-language validation sample or English-population norms, they describe that specific research context rather than validating the English-language version.
When you finish the twenty items, your responses are combined into one overall score placed along a single continuum with low, moderate, and high bands, matching the general shape of the source instrument. While the original EMQ sums responses across a seven-point scale, this online adaptation uses a fixed five-point response format and displays your result as a percentage, so the source's raw numerical cutoffs are adapted to fit this format. Alongside your score, the chart includes a reference marker for comparison. This marker is a linear rescaling of the single Russian-language study sample mean—not a general-population norm, validated percentile, or benchmark for an English-speaking population—so it should be read only as a rough point of reference.
Your result on this scale is best understood as a snapshot of the habits and attitudes you report today, not a permanent verdict on your character or personal worth. How we respond to questions about values, potential, and relationships naturally shifts with life stages, stress levels, and changing responsibilities. A lower or moderate score simply highlights room for reflection and everyday adjustment, while a higher score suggests that your current routines feel closely aligned with your priorities.
This test is provided for educational and self-reflective purposes only. It is not a clinical instrument, a psychological diagnosis, or a measure of treatment need, and it cannot substitute for professional advice. This adaptation is based on the Emotional Maturity Questionnaire (EMQ) by Mark Atkinson (2012), but it is not affiliated with Mark Atkinson, the 2015 study authors, or any university or publishing organization.
References
- Atkinson, M. (2012). True Happiness: Your Complete Guide to Emotional Health. Piatkus Books.
- Yelshansky, S. P., Anufriev, A. F., Kamaletdinova, Z. F., Saparin, O. E., & Semyonov, D. V. (2015). Psychometrical Indicators of the Russian-Language Version of M. Atkinson’s Scale of Emotional Maturity. Modern Scientific Research and Innovations, no. 10 (54), pp. 547–558.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the Emotional Maturity Test measure?
The twenty-question assessment measures overall emotional maturity on a single integrated scale rather than dividing responses into separate personality traits.
What does the Emotional Maturity Test result show?
The result reflects how closely everyday habits and attitudes toward personal growth and relationships align with a life directed by personal values.
What research is the Emotional Maturity Test based on?
This questionnaire is based on the Emotional Maturity Questionnaire introduced by researcher Mark Atkinson in 2012, without any official affiliation.
Can the Emotional Maturity Test provide a clinical diagnosis?
No, this assessment serves as a self-report tool for personal reflection and does not provide a clinical evaluation or psychological diagnosis.
How should I answer the Emotional Maturity Test questions?
For an accurate result, respond to all twenty items honestly based on your actual everyday choices and attitudes rather than ideal behaviors.
English
Español
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Polski
Українська
Русский
Türkçe
العربية
日本語
한국어
ไทย
汉语
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa 